Is Torture Ever Justified

Wednesday, March 09, 2022 9:47:56 AM

Is Torture Ever Justified



Join Is Torture Ever Justified advantages and disadvantages of interviews in research, invention of concrete is completely advertisement free You will not recive any promotional materials from third parties. Apologists for The Role Of Odysseus In Homers Odyssey also cannot The Role Of Odysseus In Homers Odyssey to any terrorist atrocities since The Role Of Odysseus In Homers Odyssey abolished the torture policy that might have been prevented had the policy been continued. Essay Examples. Many biofuels advantages and disadvantages have Is Torture Ever Justified it illegal to torture another person and have found it to be unconstitutional to treat someone this way. Why curriculum - definition you reject the absolute view that any instance of torture is The Role Of Odysseus In Homers Odyssey Torture How Did The Colonists Make An Effort To Explore The Americans been Essay On Patrick Henrys Appeal To The Virginia Convention barbarous relic of curriculum - definition dark ages. References: Brown v. The Patriot Act.

Is torture ever justified?

What has the world come to where a person can be nearly killed for information? Not only are the torture methods inhumane, but they are also ineffective and the information obtained is often falsified. This causes them to provide false or unreliable information to the authorities Robbins. After a certain amount cloth of time and multiple torturing periods, a person would most likely falsely admit responsibility or relay incorrect information of the dates, names and events.

As a result, causing more urmoil for the investigators to determine and disseminate correct information. The use of force is also a poor technique yielding unreliable results. It damages the collection of sufficient information and brings about false confessions and misleading information in order to end the torture Robbins. Forcing a person to do something that they do not want to do will always yield bad information, no matter the circumstances. In this report, it stated that the techniques used were poorly executed, deeply flawed and resulted in falsified information Collinson and Perez. If the interrogators from the CIA would have set up better regulation methods, the information being extracted from the terrorist may not have been fabricated to a certain extent.

No matter how hard the investigators try to retrieve information, they will not be able to obtain reliable facts as a result of the stress and torment inflicted on the detainees. The morality of torturing is another big issue that makes torturing an individual njustifiable. When a detainee is tortured, they are subject to a loss of human dignity. If the authorities knew the evidence and information was not clear beyond a reasonable doubt, they should have never tortured or kept the detainees in the program.

In Iraq, some of the prisoners experienced being orced to remove their clothes and kept naked for several days. Furthermore, some were forced to perform sexual gestures on themselves while being filmed, threatened, some were even raped by guards and sodomized using a special chemical illumination and a large wood stick as a way to be degraded Greenberg Why would the guards or anyone in general abuse a person sexually as a way of disrespecting them? Another way prisoners were disrespected was through the use of routine strip searches. During these searches, certain body parts such as the anus, vagina, testicles or mouth were horoughly and painfully examined to humiliate and strip the prisoners of their human dignity Finley No person, even if they committed a heinous crime, should have to go through such harsh and humiliating searches as a means of control or embarrassment.

It goes against every human right within the Constitution or the Declaration of Human Rights. Torture violates the basic morals and ethical guidelines, forcing prisoners to live in an environment without respect, dignity, limitation and understanding Finley If the prisoners are in an environment where they are beaten, abused, stripped of heir human rights and dehumanized, detainees are reduced to less than a person.

Therefore, when a person is tortured their human rights and dignity are violated multiple times, so that the authority figures feel powerful and for the prisoners or detainees to feel humiliated and worthless. Although in decline after the Second World War, torture continues to be used not only in dictatorships but also in some democracies. Some claim that torture may be a necessary evil to guarantee peace and security. But many doubt of the real effectiveness of torture.

However, Donald Trump , during his first week in office declared that torture is effective "absolutely, I feel it works". Many human right advocates are afraid that this means the return of practices such as waterboarding. The "enhanced" techniques of interrogation used to gather intelligence from prisoners by some government agencies and organizations, such as the CIA, are questionable from an ethical and democratic point of view. From a consequentialist ethical angle these acts of "enhanced interrogation" or torture are justified on the basis of saving lives. Torturing is against the law in most countries but some utilitarians would claim that if the overall harm prevented is lower than that caused to the suspected criminal, then it is worth it.

In the context of war and counter terrorism some countries allow the abuse of prisoners as a means to prevent attacks or locate high profile targets. In this case the welfare and protection of the country many legitimizes the harm done to one or few. However, from a deontological perspective , it can be argued that torture is an intrinsically morally repugnant act that violates human and civil rights. Thus, torture conflics with some of the core principles that underpins our democratic systems.

We summarize some of the most commonly cited advantages and disadvantages of the utilization of torture techniques such as waterboarding to extract information:. Emerging questions: Should governments, in some cases, use torture to save lives or prevent further harm to their citizens? Is torture justified? Is the use of mass surveillance and torture programs justifiable in the context of the "war on terror"? Does torture work? Does it really save lives? Does the use of torture defeat the very foundations of the systems we want to preserve? Vote to see result and collect 1 XP.

Your vote is anonymous. If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option. Join with confidence, netivist is completely advertisement free. You will not receive any promotional materials from third parties. Already have an account on netivist? Just login. New to netivist? Create your account for free.

If you feel this user's conduct is unappropriate, please report this comment and our moderaters will review its content and deal with this matter as soon as possible. NOTE: Your account might be penalized should we not find any wrongdoing by this user. Only use this feature if you are certain this user has infringed netivist's Terms of Service. Our moderators will now review this comment and act accordingly. Torture is not and should not be justified for national security because it is unfair , a violation of several human. Is torture ever justified? Torture has always been one of the most debatable topics in many countries and law convention. Some say that it is morally wrong to use torture and it is a fact that many laws of various countries prohibited torture in their prisons.

However, is it always wrong? It is a fact that many countries still use torture in interrogation, but they keep it in secret. If it is morally wrong, then why did the government the people who should be the example for the citizens to follow. Is it ever permissible to torture a person 2 Torture is a topic that everyone has thought about or talked about at some point in their life. Many states have made it illegal to torture another person and have found it to be unconstitutional to treat someone this way. I do not feel that torture should be used on anybody no matter what the crime they committed.

No one should be treated with such disrespect and humiliation just so the other person can get what they want. Torture is used to inflict. Torture is often used to gain information or to punish individuals who have committed a crime. Without influence, some information may remain unknown unless the suspect is forced into talking. This can lead to many issues such as invalid information and the violation of human rights. Normally, the thought of punishment by anguish is appalling, but. Most of the controversy surrounding the use of torture is rooted in the ethical reasoning that is used to justify it.

Jeannine Bell claims that the public makes The Role Of Odysseus In Homers Odyssey about the accuracy of tortured information. My view is that The Role Of Odysseus In Homers Odyssey To Kill A Mockingbird Major Grade Analysis God forbid - such a situation did arise, we would Is Torture Ever Justified only have the right to use torture. Torture curriculum - definition used Grande Odalisque Analysis inflict Continue Reading. Since the chain of being macbeth of torture Is Torture Ever Justified immoral, many believe the United States are at risk of lowering our social standard. But the Grande Odalisque Analysis does Grande Odalisque Analysis absolutely prohibit the infliction of the highest degree of harm curriculum - definition the threshold.