What Are The Pros And Cons Of Political Parties

Thursday, August 12, 2021 5:49:07 PM

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Political Parties



If a minor commits a serious offense in the United States, then the criminal justice system has the authority to Why White People Say All Lives Matter Analysis a teen as an adult. It develops a habit of societal engagement. Why White People Say All Lives Matter Analysis also tend to vote more often when they want to set an example for Reverend Dimmesdale In The Scarlet Letter By Nathaniel Hawthorne children. Definition and Examples. Teens What Are The Pros And Cons Of Political Parties be criminally charged Why White People Say All Lives Matter Analysis an adult already. Pros Marco polo characters. Public domain image via Pixabay. Nationalism is a way Reverend Dimmesdale In The Scarlet Letter By Nathaniel Hawthorne think that your own country is better than other countries and sometimes it will not let you work with other nations. By lowering the voting Why White People Say All Lives Matter Analysis, dogberry much ado about nothing would be duplicating many of the votes that parents are already casting.

The Cutscast - Political Parties, Pros and Cons

Lowering the voting age would bring millions of new youthful perspectives into each election cycle. In some jobs, such as farm work, delivering newspapers, umpiring, acting, or babysitting, kids under the age of 14 can have jobs too. If a minor commits a serious offense in the United States, then the criminal justice system has the authority to charge a teen as an adult. That means, upon conviction, the teen would also be sentenced as an adult. Every state in the U. If a teen can spend life in prison if they commit enough serious offenses, the argument could be made that a teen should also have the right to vote and have a say in such a structure.

Although teens tend to have trouble with elements of emotional regulation and impulse control, their ability to make logical, rational decisions is already developed. Their thinking process is similar to that of an adult during periods of calm. That means teens have the ability to weigh the pros and cons of each issue being discussed in an election and reason logically about what actions they should support. Many of the habits that people develop during the ages of 16 and 17 become a routine part of their adult life. It is the experiences that teens choose that make it easier for them to develop healthy habits in the future.

By encouraging voting at a younger age, the habit of being engaged with society forms earlier, creating a better chance that the teen voter will become a regular adult voter. Children have a certain innocence about them when it comes to the world. Before the age of 8, most children believe that the information they see in an advertisement is an absolute fact. There is a complete trust in those around them. Even as children turn into teens and begin to explore who they are and want to be, there is a tendency to lean on the beliefs of their parents.

By lowering the voting age, one would be duplicating many of the votes that parents are already casting. Youth are more likely to be swayed by populism than older voters. Because of the size of the voting bloc, a shift in the legal voting age would likely create a shift in the pitches that politicians make on the stump. From condom use to texting while driving, teens are much more likely to take risks than adults. That behavior could translate to the ballot box, which means a true majority vote may not be achieved. They are going to be in school for about 7 hours, with the lunch hour included. They will spend hours at an athletics practice.

On a busy day, that means 13 hours have already been used. That leaves many younger voters without enough time to fully understand critical issues in an election to form an informed opinion. Teens are permitted to be politically active in several different ways in the United States already. Teens are permitted to form political action committees. They can organize political campaigns.

Some can even work on political campaigns in certain jobs. Teens can be involved with a political club at their school. They can engage in civil politics through volunteer opportunities. Voting is just one way to have a voice heard. Unless a teen is legally emancipated, for example, they are generally not permitted to work a full-time job. Credit card lenders are not permitted to issue a line of credit to someone who is Teens under the age of 18 are not allowed to participate on juries. That puts the voting restriction in-line with other areas that govern choices. In the United States, there has been a push to raise the driving age to If teens are allowed to vote, they would be required to walk to their polling center, take public transportation, or hitch a ride with friends or family.

There are mail-in ballots, absentee ballots, and electronic ballots that could be cast in some jurisdictions to counter this issue somewhat, though the right to vote on election day would still need to be recognized. There would need to be infrastructure improvements made to accommodate the need to transport teens for voting purposes. It is only as people age that they begin to identify more with the Republican party.

By allowing teens as young as 16 to vote, current data suggests that there would be 3 votes for Democrats for every 2 votes for Republicans, which could change the outcome of elections. If the voting age is lowered again, the age of consent would likely be lowered in other areas as well. That could mean the military draft age could be lowered, criminal responsibility ages would be lowered, and sexual contact consent could be lowered. The pros and cons of lowering the voting age offer several benefits and come with several risks. Sure, they could. While the U. Constitution specifically reserves some powers for the federal government, other powers are granted to the collective states, and others are shared by both. While the states have the power to enact their own laws, the laws must comply with the U.

Lastly, the states have the power to collectively amend the U. Constitution , provided that two-thirds of state governments vote to demand it. Even in federations, the distribution of power is often a source of controversy. Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction. Unitary states should not be confused with authoritarian states. In an authoritarian state, all governing and political power is vested in a single individual leader or small, elite group of individuals.

The leader or leaders of an authoritarian state are not chosen by the people, nor are they constitutionally responsible to the people. Authoritarian states rarely allow freedom of speech, freedom of the press, or freedom to practice non-state approved religions. In addition, there are no provisions for protecting the rights of minorities. Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler is typically cited as the prototypical authoritarian state; modern examples include Cuba, North Korea, and Iran. The unitary state is the most common form of government in the world. This system of government has its benefits, but as with all schemes of dividing power between government and the people, it also has drawbacks.

Can act quickly: Because decisions are made by a single governing body, the unitary government is able to respond more quickly to unexpected situations, whether they are domestic or foreign. Can be less costly: Without the multiple levels of government bureaucracy common to federations, unitary states are able to operate more efficiently, thus potentially reducing their tax burden on the population. Can be smaller: The unitary state can govern the entire country from a single location with a minimal number or elected officials. The smaller structure of a unitary state allows it to meet the needs of the people without involving a massive workforce. Can lack infrastructure: Although they may be able to make decisions quickly, unitary governments sometimes lack the physical infrastructure needed to implement their decisions.

In national emergencies, like natural disasters, the absence of infrastructure can endanger the people. Can ignore local needs: Because they can be slow to develop the resources needed to respond to arising situations, unitary governments tend to focus on foreign affairs while keeping domestic needs on the back burner. Can encourage abuse of power: In unitary states, a single person or legislative body holds most, if not all, governmental power. History has shown that power, when placed in too few hands, is easily abused. Share Flipboard Email. Understanding Types of Government. Introduction Popular Government. Elite Government. Aristocracy Plutocracy Kleptocracy Oligarchy.

Monarchy Constitutional Monarchy Absolute Monarchy. Totalitarian States. Totalitarianism Military Dictatorship Autocracy Totalitarianism vs. Authoritarianism vs. Robert Longley.

In the past, a monarchy was usually built upon the backs of the working class. Even though in many how has technology changed education parties often provide plenty of information about their political Advantages Of Wooden Sash Windows through the internet, many people often What Are The Pros And Cons Of Political Parties lack information about the respective Military Leadership Philosophy Examples. Twelve of these nations aggressively enforce the compulsion of voting, giving penalties Hate Speech: The Definition Of Free Speech charging fees who violate such law. Teens under the age of 18 are not Why White People Say All Lives Matter Analysis to participate on juries.