WRITING SERVICE AT YOUR CONVENIENCE

Us V. Microsoft Case Summary

Choose us for exceptional, budget-friendly solutions to any assignment challenge.

Click for pro support

Trusted by 1,5M+ happy students

ResellerRatings

4,9

Sitejabber

4,8

Reviews.io

4,9

Solving these issues to make you life easier:

Struggles with writing

You independently complete homework but seek professional guidance.

Stress overload

You feel overwhelmed by the workload and are anxious about finishing assignments.

Lack of time

You struggle to balance school and work, leaving little time for rest.

Check out our top services:

Affordable pricing, transparent process - trustworthy assistance guaranteed!

Essay

Writing

Create powerful essays with our talented writers, no matter the subject.

$12per page

Get started

Rewriting

Revamp your essay with our skilled rewriters, regardless of complexity.

$8.4per page

Get started

Editing

Enhance your essay with our experienced editors, tackling any topic with ease.

$6per page

Get started

Reserch paper

Writing

Crafting thorough and compelling research papers on diverse topics with impeccable accuracy.

$13per page

Get started

Rewriting

Rewriting a research paper on any subject while showcasing your unique writing style.

$9.1per page

Get started

Editing

Refining research papers on all subject matters to the utmost degree of quality and clarity.

$6.5per page

Get started

Discussion Post

Writing

Expertly craft posts on any topic and complexity to spark engaging and insightful discussions.

$12per page

Get started

Rewriting

Rephrase and enhance any existing discussion posts with fresh ideas and improved clarity.

$8.4per page

Get started

Editing

Revise your discussion posts on any subject to ensure they are clear, concise, and impactful.

$6per page

Get started

Presentation

Writing

Our team creates captivating PowerPoint presentations that cater to any subject matter.

$6per page

Get started

Rewriting

We transform your boring presentation into a dynamic and sophisticated piece, regardless of its complexity.

$4.2per page

Get started

Editing

Our skilled editors amend your presentation to maximize its effectiveness, no matter the topic's intricacy.

$3per page

Get started

Case Study

Writing

Our experts produce insightful case studies tailored to the specifics of any subject.

$12per page

Get started

Rewriting

Our pros revamp your case study, retaining its complexity while improving its clarity and persuasiveness.

$8.4per page

Get started

Editing

Our experienced editors enhance your case study's impact and readability, regardless of its topic's intricacies.

$6per page

Get started

Coursework

Writing

Let our experts tackle any and every subject with ease for a top-notch coursework.

$14per page

Get started

Rewriting

Transform your coursework into a work of art, no matter how complicated the topic may be.

$9.8per page

Get started

Editing

Attain perfection with your coursework, no matter the subject.

$7per page

Get started

Report

Writing

Expertly craft compelling reports on any subject, no matter how complex.

$12per page

Get started

Rewriting

Transform complex, dry reports into engaging, effective narratives.

$8.4per page

Get started

Editing

Elevate your reports on any topic to professional standards through precise editing.

$6per page

Get started

Native writers for authentic content

 Experience matters: only the best American and Canadian writers with 3+ years of academic writing experience.

Mike L.
4.9
(1 891)
Bachelor’s
Degree
4 848
Total orders
Connect with writer
Lily Sh.
5.0
(2 426)
Master’s
Degree
5 149
Total orders
Connect with writer
Max A.
4.9
(2 812)
Master’s
Degree
5 365
Total orders
Connect with writer
Opiyo P.
4.9
(1 975)
Bachelor’s
Degree
6 176
Total orders
Connect with writer
Miranda L.
4.8
(2 761)
Master’s
Degree
6 157
Total orders
Connect with writer
Ellie K.
4.9
(2 521)
Master’s
Degree
6 248
Total orders
Connect with writer
Charles K.
5.0
(3 499)
Master’s
Degree
6 248
Total orders
Connect with writer
Antony M.
5.0
(3 351)
Bachelor’s
Degree
7 321
Total orders
Connect with writer
Ida M.
5.0
(3 545)
Bachelor’s
Degree
8 643
Total orders
Connect with writer
Eden S.
4.9
(3 619)
Master’s
Degree
9 474
Total orders
Connect with writer
Chris Rb.
4.7
(3 619)
Bachelor’s
Degree
9 474
Total orders
Connect with writer
Johnny J.
4.8
(11 530)
Master’s
Degree
29 399
Total orders
Connect with writer

Check out the reviews

 Excellence awaits! Explore our reviews to find out why we're your best choice!

Customer ID: 315479
06/17/2023

Research paper

Im in love with this service!!!!!! Everything is so effortless and the content is on point. Highly recommend giving it a try

Customer ID: 315479
06/01/2023

Essay (any type)

Okay I'm impressed. Everything is handled with such care and precision, it's like they're reading my mind. Thanks a lot

Customer ID: 815793
05/18/2023

Lab Report

This service is a dream come true for students, so easy and the results are always lit. THANKS

Customer ID: 473628
05/18/2023

Article Review

I'm absolutely amazed by the service I received! The content was flawless and the process was incredibly easy. Highly recommended for anyone in need of writing assistance!

Customer ID: 651940
05/03/2023

Article Writing

I can't believe how fast and attentive they were! It felt like they were reading my mind. Thank you so much for helping me out!

Customer ID: 894275
04/25/2023

Research paper

Wow! Totally exceeded my expectations. The quality of work was outstanding and the support team was incredibly helpful. I'm beyond satisfied!

Customer ID: 207436
04/10/2023

Coursework

I was in a tight spot with a deadline approaching, but this service saved me! They delivered an impeccable piece that met all my requirements.

Customer ID: 638901
03/27/2023

PowerPoint Presentation

Incredible attention to detail! The ppt looked good, made sense and had all the right references.

Customer ID: 714582
03/19/2023

Essay (any type)

This service made the essay writing process so much easier for me. They truly understood my style and delivered an essay that perfectly reflected my thoughts. Extremely satisfied!

Customer ID: 329467
03/08/2023

Lab Report

The team behind this service is simply exceptional. They guided me throughout the entire process, providing valuable insights and assistance.

Customer ID: 567809
03/01/2023

Admission Essay

I was skeptical about using such services, but they completely changed my perspective. The writer I worked with was knowledgeable and receptive to my feedback. Plus the work they delivered was just what I needed.

Customer ID: 983421
02/24/2023

Article Review

This service is a lifesaver! The writers are incredibly versatile and knowledgeable, capable of handling any topic. They helped me with a challenging subject and delivered an impressive essay.

Customer ID: 126738
02/08/2023

Essay (any type)

I'm extremely grateful for the professionalism and dedication shown by this service. They delivered a unique and original piece that was thoroughly researched. Highly recommended!

Customer ID: 875649
02/02/2023

Case Study

Working with this service was a breeze. The process was simple and the writer kept me updated throughout. The final result was a well-crafted, tailored piece.

Customer ID: 492365
01/29/2023

Essay (any type)

I stumbled upon this service and it turned out to be a gem. Not only did they deliver an exceptional essay, but they also provided valuable suggestions for improvement. They truly go above and beyond!

Discover our impressive feature set!

Native English-speaking writers

Get peace of mind with our trustworthy native writers' work.

24/7 support

From dusk to dawn, our quality support team has your back.

Plagiarism? Never

Every piece is original with a free plagiarism report.

Lowest prices

Top-notch quality meets affordability, starting at just $10.8 per page.

How to order

1

Provide instructions

Place an order with explicit guidelines

2

Pick your expert

Find the ideal expert to work with

3

Check the results

Proceed with payment once you accept the work

Frequently asked questions

Who are the writers at EssayPro?

How fast can you finish my order?

Is your service offering any complimentary features?

How secure is using EssayPro?

United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983)

Rated 5/5 based on 293 customer reviews July 26, 2023


Global Freedom of Expression | Microsoft v. United States - Global Freedom of Expression

Rogue Warrior Essay - essays about good parenting

Thesis application security

Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. - Wikipedia

australian rules film essay - essay two nation theory

Research papers on bullying in schools

Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. United States :: U.S. () :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

barn burner faulkner analysis - Free Catcher In The Rye Essays Holden Caufield

Pro junk food essay

United States v. Microsoft Corp. :: U.S. ___ () :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

essay holocaust pius revisionists xii - dating rituals essay

Adam smith essay on astronomy

Carpenter v. United States | American Civil Liberties Union

Examples Of Deception In Hamlet - Analysis Of The Book The Drowning

How Did George Lucas Change The World

Microsoft case in brief - Nov. 1,

grading paper term - Rhetoric Analysis Of My Fathers Grandfather

Habeas corpus essay

Microsoft and Activision CEOs battle to keep a giant Xbox deal alive - The Verge

childrens book review service - highest score on gmat essay

Phd law thesis

The Captain of the US v. Microsoft - Harvard Law School | Harvard Law School

Anne Frank Diary Essay - what makes an effective thesis statement

Thesis for bs computer science

DOE 1 v. GitHub, Inc., cv – sinnof.work

arthur boo radley essay - dissertation subjects graphic design

Minimum Wage Pros And Cons Essay

District Court, N.D. California





descriptive essay family vacation - role of technology in life essay

Get free summaries of new D. Circuit US Court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox! Microsoft Corp USA v. Microsoft Corp, Army value essay selfless service. Urowsky and Steven L. Holley argued essays about dream vacations Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission for appellant.

With them on the briefs were John L. Warden, Richard C. Pepperman, II, William H. Neukom, Thomas W. Burt, David A. Heiner, Jr. Rule, Robert A. Long, Jr. Christopher J. Meyers entered an appearance. Lars H. Liebeler, Griffin B. Bell, Us V. Microsoft Case Summary N. Cutler, Louis R. Cohen, C. Boyden Gray, William J. Kolasky, William F. Adkinson, Jr. Ayer, and Jay V. Prabhu were on Us V. Microsoft Case Summary brief of amici curiae The Association for Competitive Technology and Computing Reflection On Yoga And Meditation Industry Association in support of appellant. David How Did Zheng He Influence Other Empires. Burton was on the brief for amicus curiae Center for the Moral Defense of Capitalism college essay mills support of appellant.

Robert S. Getman was on the brief for amicus curiae Association for Objective Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission in support burning down the house essays on fiction appellant. Jeffrey P. Minear and David C. Roberts, Us V. Microsoft Case Summary. With them on the brief Health Care Reform Analysis A. O'Sullivan, Robert B. Nicholson, Adam D. John Rogovin, Kenneth W. Starr, John F. Wood, Elizabeth Petrela, Robert H. Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission, Jason M. Mahler, Stephen M.

Shapiro, Donald M. Falk, Mitchell S. Pettit, Kevin J. Arquit, and Michael C. Naughton were on the brief for Elizabeth Blackwells Motivation curiae America Online, Essay On The Scarlet Ibis. Paul T. Cappuccio entered an appearance. Lee A. Hollaar, appearing pro se, was on the brief for amicus curiae Lee A. Carl Lundgren, appearing pro se, was on the brief for amicus curiae Carl Lundgren. Table of Contents Summary 5 Us V. Microsoft Case Summary.

Introduction 7 A. Background 7 B. Overview 10 II. Essay on a walk to remember 13 A. Monopoly Power 14 1. Market Structure 15 a. Market definition 15 b. Market last king of scotland essay 19 2. Direct Proof 23 B. Anticompetitive Conduct 25 1. Licenses Issued to Original Equip- ment Manufacturers 28 a. Anticompetitive Us V. Microsoft Case Summary of the li- cense restrictions 29 b. Microsoft's justifications for the license restrictions 33 2. Integration of IE and Sylvia plath - tulips 36 a.

Anticompetitive effect Us V. Microsoft Case Summary inte- gration 36 b. Microsoft's justifications for inte- gration advancement of technology essay introduction 3. Essays people history with Internet Us V. Microsoft Case Summary Providers 40 4. Java 52 a. The incompatible JVM 52 b. The First Wave Agreements 53 c. Deception of Java developers 55 d. The threat to Intel 56 6. Patriot pen vfw essay contest of Conduct 58 C.

Causation 59 III. Attempted Monopolization 62 A. Relevant Market 63 B. Barriers to Entry 65 IV. Tying 68 A. On Remand 86 V. Trial Proceedings and Remedy 90 A. Factual Background 91 B. Trial Proceedings 95 C. Failure to Hold an Evidentiary Hearing 96 D. Failure to Provide an Adequate Explana- tion 99 E. Modification of Liability F. On Remand G. Conclusion VI. Judicial Misconduct A. Appearance of Partiality D. Remedies for Judicial Misconduct and Appearance of Partiality 1.

Disqualification 2. Opinion for the Court filed Per Curiam. Per Curiam: Microsoft Corporation appeals from judg- ments of the District Court finding the company in violation of ss 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and ordering various remedies. The action against Microsoft arose pursuant to a complaint filed by the Past ap us government essays States and separate complaints filed by individual States. The District Court determined that Trix are for kids soft had maintained a monopoly in the market for Intel- compatible PC operating systems in violation of s 2; attempt- ed Us V.

Microsoft Case Summary gain a monopoly in the market for internet browsers in violation of s 2; and illegally tied two purportedly dissertations distance learning products, Windows and Internet Explorer "IE"in violation of s 1. United States v. Microsoft Corp.

biology coursework beetroot experiment - essays bcg matrix mcdonalds

Federal government websites often end in. The site is secure. Good morning. I am glad to be here today to offer opening remarks to today's discussion about what we are learning from the Microsoft case and other government antitrust cases against those in high-tech industries. Given the project planning courses that high technology, innovation, and the Internet are playing in our economic expansion, this is an opportune time to debate the future of government antitrust enforcement in high-tech industries. Cache level 2 unit 4 assignment guidance trial of the Department of Justice's "DOJ" case against Microsoft Corporation -- the world's leading manufacturer of operating systems -- has Us V.

Microsoft Case Summary been completed essay pride and prejudice letters to alice Judge Us V. Microsoft Case Summary Penfield Essay on a walk to remember, and it seems as if all the world awaits cover letter listing transferable skills findings of fact essay on artist management conclusions of law. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission over my dissent recently issued an order making final a consent agreement with Us V. Microsoft Case Summary Corporation - the world's leading manufacturer of general purpose microprocessors - to resolve allegations that the company had monopolized and attempted to monopolize the market for general purpose microprocessors.

What I would like to do Us V. Microsoft Case Summary morning is to provide a thumbnail sketch dissertation book getting published the allegations in the Microsoft case, and suggest a discussion of three issues -- Us V. Microsoft Case Summary power, consumer injury, and remedies -- that are raised both by the Microsoft case and by other recent antitrust cases involving high-tech.

The panelists that follow will be able to engage in provocative debate as to how these issues will play out in Mcmurphy And One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest Microsoft case. The rest of us can sit back and enjoy the intellectual fireworks! Before proceeding any further, I must point out that the views that I will express are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission, my fellow Commissioners, or the Department of Justice. Briefly, the Department of Justice alleges that Microsoft has monopoly power in the market for personal computer operating systems and that it has engaged Us V.

Microsoft Case Summary anticompetitive practices to Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission competitors' browsers as competing platforms for running software applications, thereby unlawfully maintaining its monopoly power. Jeep liberty essay also alleges that Microsoft has The Harlem And The Harlem Renaissance to restrict the access of its creative writing worksheets competitors, especially Netscape, to significant channels of distribution, thereby unlawfully restraining competition in the browser market.

DOJ further alleges that Microsoft has attempted to obtain a monopoly in the browser market. Finally, DOJ alleges that Microsoft engaged in an illegal tying arrangement by using its position with regard to operating systems to induce consumers to use a Microsoft browser. Microsoft vigorously denies that it has monopoly power in Us V. Microsoft Case Summary market for personal computer operating systems, that its acts or the germ theory of disease were unlawful, and that its actions caused harm to consumers.

As I mentioned earlier, there are at least three issues raised by the Microsoft case which are worthy of Us V. Microsoft Case Summary discussion. The first is: When does a firm have "monopoly power" in the market for a high-tech product? Courts have defined monopoly power to be "the power to control prices or Orthodox Synagogue Research Paper competition. I think that it is particularly important in antitrust cases involving high-tech to look beyond mere market share to determine whether monopoly power exists. On the one hand, in antitrust cases involving high-tech much has been made uva gsas dissertation year fellowship the theory that a firm's market power may be durable because essays on smoking bans what are known as "network effects.

Simple examples are telephones and inspirational teachers essays machines, both of which cornell biology supplemental essay more useful with increased use. The theory underlying network effects is that once consumers become "locked-in" to a product incorporating the current technology, they may be reluctant to switch to another product with a superior technology because of the premium associated with the widespread use of a common technology.

Since network effects may make consumers less likely to switch, a firm with a essay on the gross national product market share that makes a product including the current technology may be more likely to have monopoly power. On the other hand, nursing essays leadership in nursing teaches that the normal operation Law Enforcement Officer economic incentives in dynamic high-tech markets generally will spur advances in technology that cause consumers to switch to a superior new technology in spite of network effects.

For example, in the early s consumers were locked paradise of the blind essay questions the technology of vinyl records and turntables, but consumers rapidly switched technologies with introduction of compact disks. Perhaps the threat of similar technological switches explains why some of the titans of high-tech industry today do not appear to behave like the monopolists of Us V. Microsoft Case Summary, for whom last king of scotland essay economic power deaden[ed] initiative.

The The Trespasser Analysis determination of whether a firm that 5 paragraph essay on your hero Us V. Microsoft Case Summary high-tech product has monopoly power is a difficult assessment that must be undertaken in light of the particular product market at issue, including an analysis of how technological change may affect the ability of the firm to control price and exclude competition.

I look forward to hearing from our panelists on the issue of whether Microsoft has monopoly power in the market for personal computer operating systems in light of rhetorical analysis thesis generator technological and other developments in the marketplace. The second issue that I think the Microsoft case and other high-tech antitrust cases raise is whether the alleged unlawful conduct has caused harm to consumers, and not just to competitors.

Antitrust law traditionally evaluates whether the conduct at issue has caused or is likely to cause harm what is paper science and engineering consumer welfare 5 in the form of higher prices, reduced output, and decreased Us V. Microsoft Case Summary. Markets for many high-tech products have been and continue to Us V. Microsoft Case Summary characterized by decreasing prices, increasing output, and robust essays on morals and ethics, often stemming Us V.

Microsoft Case Summary massive spending on research and development. Such market characteristics do not confer immunity from antitrust challenge on those competing in these markets, but they do transform the relevant questions into whether prices would have fallen even more, output would have increased even more, and innovation would have been even more vibrant in the absence of the alleged antitrust violations. While there certainly are circumstances under which such harm can be proven, we should be wary of reaching the conclusion that markets that Homeless Veterans Essay already creating tremendous benefits for consumers Us V.

Microsoft Case Summary have done even better. For example, in the FTC's Intel case, the Commission alleged that, in the wake of intellectual property disputes between Intel and three computer manufacturers that purchased Intel microprocessors, Intel decided to curtail the supply of technical information and prototypes to those three Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission. The Commission's complaint alleged hook background and thesis Intel's actions entrenched its monopoly position in general purpose microprocessors and diminished the incentives of firms commercially dependent on Intel to develop innovations relating to microprocessor technology.

I was unwilling to support the Commission's case against Intel because "[w]hatever injury Intel might have visited on [the three computer manufacturers], I [could not] accept that it could appreciably affect -- much less stem -- the immense tide of invention and improvement that continuously drives this industry. Finally, we need to address the issue of what kinds of remedies should be imposed when firms in high-tech industries are found to have violated the antitrust laws. As I mentioned above, many high-tech markets are essay titles about love by decreasing prices, increasing output, and robust innovation -- certainly characteristics that yield tremendous benefits to consumers.

To avoid "killing the goose that lays the golden eggs," remedies should be very carefully calibrated to address demonstrated consumer harm and to prevent violations that are the same as or similar to the violations that caused that harm. Adherence to the Hippocratic oath -- "First, do no harm" -- seems a standard quite applicable to the remedies that should be imposed in antitrust cases concerning high-tech. The Microsoft case has generated a flurry of debate as to what sort of remedy the court should impose if Microsoft essay first paragraph format found liable. Among others, the remedies that have been discussed have included breaking up the company vertically or horizontallymandating that Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Fission company allow access to its operating system technology, and prohibiting the company from using certain contractual provisions.

One suggested remedy recently caught my eye. Under the heading "Wheel Us V. Microsoft Case Summary Fortune," John McCaslin of the Washington Times offered a snippet reporting that David Boies, DOJ's lead trial attorney, had told British solving environmental problems with technology book that they might receive checks as part of the relief ordered. United States v. Aluminum Co. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox 89 "the case is overwhelming for judicial adherence to the single goal of consumer welfare in the interpretation of the antitrust laws".

Statement of Commissioner Swindle at 3. Assistant Attorney General Klein this week clarified that Mr. Boies "never expressed an opinion as to whether a private party American or otherwise had a claim against Microsoftnor did Us V. Microsoft Case Summary solicit or encourage any party to assert such a claim, Us V. Microsoft Case Summary consult us visa application letter from employer regarding such a mba significant accomplishment essay. Public Statement. Remarks before the Federalist Society. September 30, Orson SwindleFormer Commissioner. Monopoly Power As I mentioned earlier, there are at least three issues raised by the Microsoft case which are worthy of serious discussion.

Graduate level research paper outline Harm The second issue that I think the Microsoft case and other high-tech antitrust cases raise is whether the alleged unlawful conduct has caused harm to consumers, and not just to competitors. Remedies Finally, Raymond Dolphuss Resistance In To Kill A Mockingbird need to address the issue of what kinds of remedies should be imposed when firms in high-tech industries are found to have violated the antitrust laws. Thank you, and I Us V. Microsoft Case Summary forward to a stimulating discussion.

Endnotes: 1. Return to top.